The “Hajji” and Nina Ricci

Nooshabeh Amiri
Nooshabeh Amiri

At a large shopping center in Paris, a Muslim cleric wearing a black robe with a white turban, ‎commonly known as a Hajji, caught my attention. He was intensely engaged in a conversation ‎with a salesperson at a perfumery, as he purchased perfumes and occasionally looked at two ‎young men, his companions, mentioning a name or two, asking them not to forget about them as ‎well. So I stood and watched. He bought one, then another one, and soon there were several ‎selections on the counter soon to be in his possession. Of course they were the most fashionable ‎one, Nina Ricci. I felt good that clerics now bought perfume. But then another thought crept in: ‎What happened?‎

It took me back to the Iran of 1984. Everywhere we went, we were subjected to body searches ‎and frisking. We knew that the possession of a lipstick or an eye liner in the purse of a woman ‎amounted to an “unforgiveable crime” in the Islamic Republic of Iran, just five years into the ‎cleric “Islamic Revolution”. The cosmetics would be “confiscated” amid insults and public ‎humiliation with such remarks as, “Till when do you wish to make yourselves look like Western ‎dolls.” But I was free from such encounters. Why? Times were such that I had stopped even ‎looking at myself in the mirror. My husband was in prison and I searched for news about him. ‎My life revolved around going from one government officials to another to deliver a letter about ‎my husband, about my life and present my plea. I searched for justice, to discover that there was ‎none, or a person who would really listen to my story. ‎

On that particular day, coming to yet another government office, I entered the room of “Sisters’ ‎Inspections,” drowned in my thoughts. As unsure as I was about everything else, one thing I was ‎certain of: I had no lipstick or eye liner in my bag. I was already wearing the required black veil ‎given to me at the entrance, which also seems to have absorbed the grief of people like me ‎whenever it was worn. And so I put my bag on the table in front of the “sister” (as these women ‎friskers and inspectors were called, and who called us the same in return). Turning it over, out ‎came the pens, paper, a book, etc. Then suddenly she screamed “Vay” (the closest English ‎language equivalent of the term being a shocking Wow or, an Oh my God). The shriek returned ‎me to the real world as heads turned and eyes gazed. “What is this garbage you put in your bags, ‎oh”, she uttered in apparent frustration.‎

I too was shocked, but at her reference, and also wondered what was the “garbage.” Then the ‎scent hit my nostrils and the story lit up. A small perfume vial resting in a buried pocket for years ‎was shattered because of the “deep” inspection of the sister, its fragrance changing the ‎immediate ambiance. ‎

Fearing that the scent was going to prevent me from entering the building, I said, “This was there ‎from before. I no longer even put on perfume.” My gaffe made matters worse. “So you did wear ‎perfume before,” she said triumphantly with the satisfaction of an interrogator’s discovery. ‎

In short, my crime now became wearing perfume in the past. Eventually, amid the disgusted look ‎of the sister - as if she had just smelled crap - and her insulting remarks, I received permission to ‎enter the building. But on that day too, my quest for justice fell on the cold floor of the building. ‎The perfumed bag however remained in the balcony of our house so that its scent “from the past” ‎would fade away under the sunshine. Which it did.‎

Now, that same fragrance rose in the Parisian store. And in massive volume. Probably ‎for all the “sisters” of the clerics, as all the perfume on the counter could not be for just ‎one “sister”.‎

The reason I mention this encounter is because seeing a cleric buying perfume is in fact ‎a good sign. A sign that after staying in power for some thirty years, which if not ‎pleasing to the people of Iran, had taught some to enjoy sweet scent. After all, what is ‎life if not this kind of learning. Learning that could have brought so much less pain had ‎it arrived earlier and then nobody would have been insulted and humiliated for ‎possessing perfume; nobody would have been punished and flogged for possessing a ‎video cassette; nobody would have been dumped behind bars for installing a satellite ‎TV receiver in his house; nobody would have gone blind for drinking a home-made ‎drink with the wrong alcohol, which these very moral authorities keep in sealed ‎containers for themselves; and more. Each one of us can make lengthy lists of such ‎painful episodes in our lives and in those of our loved ones. ‎

Perhaps these games were meant to keep the scents, tastes, and pleasant moments away from ‎those who recognized sweet perfume, a good film, an exciting drink, so that the pre-selected few ‎would freely indulge in them to enjoy some moments of their own existence. But do they know ‎that behind every scent is a flower, behind every film a story, behind every drink a world of pain ‎which they would like to “forget” or momentarily leave behind?‎